Gizmo Project.com Put to the Test

Today we tried out Gizmo, being prompted by the minute from Michael Robertson of mp3.com and Lindows/Linspire. It’s pretty nice. He’s touting it as a better alternative to Skype, which has become immensely popular as of late. I’m glad to see that there’s going to be some competition. If I got some decent hardware, I could easily use this to replace a landline and even cellular phone. The internet connection doesn’t need to be extraordinarily robust. Anything equivalent to the speed of what a 33.6k modem would provide, or faster, would be fine.

Assuming abundant free wi-fi access points, I could just take a laptop with me (which I’d do anyway) and forget the cell phone.

Anonymous comments

are not really anonymous. WordPress was messing them up. Something is wrong with get_currentuserinfo(), but I’m too lazy to really look into it. So I just commented out that line of code. It works. Leave a comment (with your name and website URL).

On megabytes and gigabytes

Joseph created his Gmail account today.

When he saw the front page, he thought Google was providing 2344 megabytes of storage to be shared among everyone in the world. That’s hardly anything, he thought.

In fact, Google gives that amount of space to each account.

Then he said, “I thought megabytes were WAY bigger than gigabytes.”

When we told him it was the other way around, he said, “I thought there are like 1,200 gigabytes… I mean MEGABYTES, in a gigabyte.”

Joseph is awesome.

Update for Windows XP KB898461

Size: 477 KB

This update installs a permanent copy of Package Installer for Windows to enable software updates to have a significantly smaller download size. The Package Installer facilitates the install of software updates for Microsoft Windows operating systems and other Microsoft products. After you install this update, you may have to restart your system.

More information for this update can be found at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/KB898461

Search Terms – July 2004

The last time I did this was over a year ago!

Let’s go one year back in time and start with my intelliot.com search terms for July 2004.

Top 20 of 241 Total Search Strings
# Hits Search String
1 739 58.28% motive smartbridge
2 140 11.04% motive smartbridge autoupdate
3 16 1.26% what is motive smartbridge
4 13 1.03% kb840374
5 9 0.71% gengar
6 8 0.63% h4x0r5 0n teh yu0r pc
7 7 0.55% aim error category 4
8 6 0.47% smartbridge motive
9 6 0.47% what icons are doing while you sleep…
10 5 0.39% 378 internet marketing predictions
11 5 0.39% intp
12 5 0.39% smartbridge autoupdate
13 4 0.32% aim category 4 code 1
14 4 0.32% fugue for tinhorns
15 4 0.32% internet marketing predictions
16 4 0.32% lyrics six in the morning come to my hotel
17 4 0.32% what are backlinks
18 3 0.24% ‘motive smartbridge’
19 3 0.24% aim error category 4 error code 1
20 3 0.24% elliot lee

It’s amazing how many people looked for “motive smartbridge”, and found it on my site.

October 24, 2007: I really wonder if anyone ever found these kinds of stats interesting. It’s been ages since I’ve published this kind of info! Maybe it needs more analysis.

Combining small RAMs for something big

The Apple Mac mini has only one RAM slot, and for good reason: its purpose is to be small. When I picked up a 1 GB stick and popped it in, I was left with the original 256 MB stick that came with it.

Unsure what to do with it, I decided to crack open my trusty old Dell Dimension 4600, which I got years ago for much less than the cost of a Mac mini, and see if I could add it in.

After sucking out tons of dust using a vacuum, I was ready to look at what was available for expansion.

Sure enough, the computer has four RAM slots – and only three were being used. I suppose that at least one of these was from some other old computer, but I really don’t remember anymore. Anyway, although I wasn’t certain the RAM would be compatible, I threw in the 256 stick from the mini.

This gave me a grand total of 1024 MB RAM — the same amount as what I have in my Mac mini now — effectively for free. Some other people might let their old, original RAM sticks sit on the side, gathering dust; but not me. It’s going to be put to good use!

Water Powered Clock

I’m looking through the “Gifts for Dads” section on ThinkGeek.com, and I’m quite disappointed.

Every product looks good when they talk about it in the description, but when I do some research on it, I find it’s not quite what they claim.

So buyer beware! Even (or ‘especially’) ThinkGeek.com uses marketing tricks to make things sound better than they are.

First, I looked at the Cold Heat Soldering Tool. It sounds great, but then you read the reviews on Amazon.com.

The way this thing works, from what I observed, is there is 2 parts to the tip. The 2 parts act like an anode and cathode, and the way the tool is “activated” is when you short the anode and cathode with a piece of conductive metal, which is supposed be your solder. When this happens the tool sends high current though the solder causing it to heat up and melt. It’s very similar to welding; you can even see a spark when you short the 2 parts of the tip out.

Problem is that the normal way of soldering circuitry to a board, where you put the tip to the parts you want joined and feed solder to them doesn’t work with this tool. And when you work it the way they want its shotty at best. It doesn’t live up to its name of COLD HEAT ether, the tip is a hot as a normal iron after a bit of soldering.

I guess this would come in useful if you are in a situation where you have no access to a wall outlet and/or can’t use a conventional soldering iron. But even then I would use a butane soldering iron. This thing is useless.

Indeed, every tip has two sides to it, two parts that need to come in contact with the solder.

To be fair, ThinkGeek.com does not lie. They do not present any false information.

But they do leave out details. Important, but negative details.

Next, I checked out the Water Powered Clock. Turns out that -

The water isn’t the source of the power. The electricity is being produced by the difference in electrode potentials of the anode and the cathode which are inserted into the water (or potato). It’s just a battery, it looks a little bit different, but the clock draws a very small amount of current anyway. So its powered by a dissolving hunk of zinc.

When the zinc is gone, the power is gone. But the clock draws so little power that it can run for years on that little bit of zinc. However, the water is not the source of the energy.

ThinkGeek claims: “The internal converter simply extracts electrons from water (or other liquid) molecules and provides a steady stream of electrical current acting as a fuel cell to generate power to the clock.”

I’m not sure if this is a definite and absolute lie. But it very well could be.

Now, the vast majority of people don’t do as much research as I do before every purchase. So it’s got to be interesting what you can get people to buy.