Rush Limbaugh has the best argument against abortion I have ever read. After reading it, it’s no wonder that Rush is the #1 radio host. And it baffles me how anyone can support abortion after seriously thinking it through. You can read the whole argument in chapter 6 of The Way Things Ought To Be by Rush Limbaugh– probably available from your local library, which is where I got the copy I’m reading– or just read these major points…
- He does not want to rehash the old, standard arguments, but just explain why he’s pro-life and proud of it.
- “I believe that life begins at conception and that killing that human life is justifiable only when it’s necessary to save the mother’s life.”
- We are now making decisions as to who lives and who dies on the basis of whether it is convenient for the LIVING. That’s dangerous.
- “…just 7 percent of all abortions are motivated by ‘hard cases.’” 3% the mother’s health; 3% the baby has a possible health problem; 1% rape or incest. 93% birth control or societal reasons.
- The most common justification is that it is a woman’s right to choose.
- To choose what? Can a woman choose to steal, using her own body? Can she choose to do drugs, according to the law?
- Consider prostitution and drugs, which are both illegal: there is precedent for society determining what a woman can and can’t do with her body.
- The 2nd most common is that bringing a child into the world with bad circumstances isn’t right: for instance, if the mother is in poverty, the child might suffer.
- We should kill a child in the womb so that it won’t feel pain and suffering growing up? We should prevent suffering by killing?
- Debates on abortion rarely change anyone’s mind, so he tries not to get involved.
- We have to admit that some of our actions as humans have an impact on society and they have to be regulated.
- A lot of people say we should legalize cocaine and heroin: the people who are inclined to use drugs are going to do so regardless of its illegality.
- But the fact that people are going to ignore and break laws is not a valid argument for decriminalization.
- Standright and wrong and basic decency must be established and maintained.
- The erosion of the moral fabric of society is a gradual, insidious process. It happens, bit by bit, almost imperceptibly.
- “I am pro-choice. I just hope the choice is for life.”
- It shouldn’t matter to pro-choice radicals if a woman is talked out of an abortion, yet strangely it does.
- 2 reasons: (1) it is the sacrament of feminism, the fuel running their entire political agenda; (2) money.
- Abortion is a huge business; if abortions are $300 each, the money being made on abortions is perhaps $450 million/year.
- The majority of the American people are not in favor of unlimited abortion on demand, but the law was decided by Roe v. Wade, the decision of nine guys in black robes back in 1973– not a democratic fashion.
- Suppose in the not-too-distant future a doctor is able to tell the parents of a baby in a womb that it will have freckles and red hair and be prone to obesity. Then suppose the parents decide they do not want a child who would suffer from those characteristics and abort on that basis? (It’s already happening with sex-selection abortions.)
- One of those babies that was aborted 30 years ago could have discovered the cure for AIDS.
- Beethoven had a wretched childhood.
- Charles Dickens lived in poverty.
- Would you have wanted to abort them?
- “I’ve had women call me on the show and say they were almost aborted by their parents. You can’t imagine the emotional wallop that packs.”
- “We have countless ways of preventing pregnancy, which, if utilized, would negate the need for so many abortions. Our society would be much better off if that responsibility were exercised, rather than abortion used as a selfish way of escaping what is, in truth, careless and reckless behavior.”
Wow. I would like to hear how anyone can support abortion with all that in mind.
Please post your comments below.
Tags: abortion, arguments, Books, human life, pregnancy, pro-choice, pro-life, rush limbaugh, women
-
I’m not a strong believer of either side, but I’ll play devil’s advocate:
His entire argument hinges on his assertion that life begins at conception, which he lumps into the “old, standard arguments” category.
Also, some of these arguments are pretty ridiculous.
“The majority of the American people are not in favor of unlimited abortion on demand, but the law was decided by Roe v. Wade, the decision of nine guys in black robes back in 1973– not a democratic fashion.”
They found that anti-abortion laws violated the Constitution. Is he arguing that the Supreme Court is not democratic? That’s another debate.
“One of those babies that was aborted 30 years ago could have discovered the cure for AIDS.”
So could one of the billions of potential babies that people around the world chose not to even try to have. Should we all just fuck like bunnies and have billions of babies so that one of them might find a cure for cancer, or be the next Beethoven, etc? I think not. That’s the equivalent of playing the lottery. As it is, the 6 billion people already on Earth seem to be doing a pretty good job of destroying it.
“I’ve had women call me on the show and say they were almost aborted by their parents. You can’t imagine the emotional wallop that packs.â€
First of all, what kind of parents would tell their kid they almost aborted them? And how is that relevant? In a world where abortion were illegal, a parent could just as easily tell their child “if abortion were illegal, I would have aborted you” or “I wish I never had you”, which would be even more hurtful. Either way, it’s irrelevant to this debate.
-
Hi
Just bumped into your blog by chance (thanks for ThinkPad keyboard beep fix!), and coming from Denmark it’s strange to read that otherwise reasonable people is against abortion. Here in Denmark only the minority that is against abortion, so if you, for instance, speak out at party that you is against, it will definitely raise some eyebrows.
I should properly underline that I do not see you as being not reasonable, it just interesting to see someone that has another opinion. And it got me interested in reading the case against abortion.
While reading Limbaugh’s arguments I really tried to understand why one would be against abortion. I and actually think that I understand: You simply believe that is wrong kill an embryo.
I think that this belief is just as much a socialized belief, as it is a belief based on fact based reasoning. It is just very hard to change someone’s mind on this subject.
For me the important thing is that a child should not be brought into the world if it’s not the wish of the parents. For me it’s wrong to have unwanted children. It is in the wording “unwanted” – that doesn’t sound nice.
Although I have to admit that an unwanted child has just as much chance for being loved and cared for, as a wanted child has of being neglected.
Thanks for the insight into the case against! This reply isn’t meant to start a heated discussion, just my thoughts after reading you post.
Regards Emil
-
Pingback from Adventures in Parenting Updates at Elliot Lee on 12/19/2007 at 4:24 am
-
dear elliot lee,
abortion is not a good thing because the babies had nothing to do with them aborting it.aborting shouldn’t be allowed because the children deserve to live and see life.so,i understand what your saying because its not fair for them…
sincerely,
anette -
i’m majorly againat abortion. and im doing a debate at school on it. this gave me alot of information. and enough to win my argument. i think that you should take the babies hand, not the babies life.



8 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.intelliot.com/blog/2007/12/argument-against-abortion/trackback/