<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Mini in comparison to Dell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, opinions and fascinating discoveries by Elliot, a student at USC</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob J</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-385098</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-385098</guid>
		<description>2 words to people who say you cant stability on a pc

Ubuntu Linux - everything you need, no corporate control (windows or apple)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 words to people who say you cant stability on a pc</p>
<p>Ubuntu Linux - everything you need, no corporate control (windows or apple)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AX</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-181784</link>
		<dc:creator>AX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-181784</guid>
		<description>I have a Mac Mini, a PC, and an Intel Mac capable of running Windows, Linux, and OS X.

"Sorry, you’re wrong. All M$ OSes have design comprimises that make then unsecure. Add to that, their typical sloppy programming, and you have tons of security holes. Macs are more secure by design. That’s a fact and anybody who says any different, either has no clue about security, has their head in the sand, or makes money off the M$ platform."

A lot of the security compromises exist not because of mere programming or design flaws, but because of trade-offs. For instance, Windows XP performs far better in terms of responsiveness than OS X, given the same hardware. I know this for a fact since I actually run both Windows and OS X on my one Intel Mac and it's very clear which OS makes more efficient use of hardware.

Some of the security compromises like being able to create hooks into code can be very useful to a software engineer. Unfortunately they also leave room for malicious use, but that's true of many good things. Owning a DVD burner allows one to illegally copy DVDs (and so many people do this), but that doesn't mean that DVD burners are purely evil.

Furthermore, limiting flexibility easily allows one to write tighter and more robust software. OS X (as well as X Windows) is often a lot more limited in terms of its API and its UI than Windows. When it comes to interface customization, OS X applications are typically far more limited by nature. For some, that may justify the added robustness one can find, but for others like me, that may not be the case.

Finally, software isn't necessarily more stable on Mac than Windows. To make a semi-fair comparison (no comparison can be truly fair), we need to look at software which exists for both platforms. Lightwave, for instance, is FAR more robust on the PC than Mac. Just look at the history of bug reports, and it's clear that the Windows version is WAY more stable. The same is true of Maya. With Doom 3, aside from the fact that PC hardware of the same price floors G5's, I also experienced a lot more crashes on the G5 over my PC. When it comes to Photoshop CS, however, my PC version was admittedly less stable. Still, I remember Photoshop 6 in school on the G4 crashed a whole lot.

For the most part, I've found software that exists on both platforms to generally be stable on the Windows side. That's most likely attributed to the fact that Windows versions have a much higher demand, so developers tend to prioritize the Windows versions when it comes to testing and bug fixes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Mac Mini, a PC, and an Intel Mac capable of running Windows, Linux, and OS X.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sorry, you’re wrong. All M$ OSes have design comprimises that make then unsecure. Add to that, their typical sloppy programming, and you have tons of security holes. Macs are more secure by design. That’s a fact and anybody who says any different, either has no clue about security, has their head in the sand, or makes money off the M$ platform.&#8221;</p>
<p>A lot of the security compromises exist not because of mere programming or design flaws, but because of trade-offs. For instance, Windows XP performs far better in terms of responsiveness than OS X, given the same hardware. I know this for a fact since I actually run both Windows and OS X on my one Intel Mac and it&#8217;s very clear which OS makes more efficient use of hardware.</p>
<p>Some of the security compromises like being able to create hooks into code can be very useful to a software engineer. Unfortunately they also leave room for malicious use, but that&#8217;s true of many good things. Owning a DVD burner allows one to illegally copy DVDs (and so many people do this), but that doesn&#8217;t mean that DVD burners are purely evil.</p>
<p>Furthermore, limiting flexibility easily allows one to write tighter and more robust software. OS X (as well as X Windows) is often a lot more limited in terms of its API and its UI than Windows. When it comes to interface customization, OS X applications are typically far more limited by nature. For some, that may justify the added robustness one can find, but for others like me, that may not be the case.</p>
<p>Finally, software isn&#8217;t necessarily more stable on Mac than Windows. To make a semi-fair comparison (no comparison can be truly fair), we need to look at software which exists for both platforms. Lightwave, for instance, is FAR more robust on the PC than Mac. Just look at the history of bug reports, and it&#8217;s clear that the Windows version is WAY more stable. The same is true of Maya. With Doom 3, aside from the fact that PC hardware of the same price floors G5&#8217;s, I also experienced a lot more crashes on the G5 over my PC. When it comes to Photoshop CS, however, my PC version was admittedly less stable. Still, I remember Photoshop 6 in school on the G4 crashed a whole lot.</p>
<p>For the most part, I&#8217;ve found software that exists on both platforms to generally be stable on the Windows side. That&#8217;s most likely attributed to the fact that Windows versions have a much higher demand, so developers tend to prioritize the Windows versions when it comes to testing and bug fixes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-18751</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-18751</guid>
		<description>Stop arguing. I had a friend that loved his Mac a lot. And still does, and he would always tell me about how crappy PC's are. So i told him to come over and I'll show him my custom build. So he does, and was amazed how fast, easy to work with. I am running xp pro, with different windows style, using stylexp, and its a great system. Runs well and has no problem. I dont really care if MAC is better than PC or vice versa. But what I believe is to each his own. One person might like one way of software/hardware and one the other. Whoever says PC's suck and always uses DELL as an example is just complete bullshit. Check out Micron PC or even home built system. Mine is a AMD athlon which in actuality runs at 2.4ghz and its faster than a 3.2ghz P4. So it all depends on what hardware you have and the way its being used. I use it for games and writing for college. Listening to music and editing photos. 

But in all seriousness, quit this crap. What the guy meant in that article is that APPLE likes to falcify or sway or skew their wording. I just dont understand how they can compare it to a PC. A mac and pc are completely different, just wait until someone will compare the fasted intel duo core vs a amd athlon dual core or the new AM2 processor. And then we'll see who's faster or not. But we must understand that macs and pcs are completely different platforms. The biggest reason why I'm a pc user is the games, my geforce can kick ass, and it works great and i dont have to wait 4 years until an upgrade comes around. And i dont have to worry about buying the wrong hardware that wouldnt work with a mac. 

www.newegg.com baby!!!!


Anyways please quit this argument, its just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop arguing. I had a friend that loved his Mac a lot. And still does, and he would always tell me about how crappy PC&#8217;s are. So i told him to come over and I&#8217;ll show him my custom build. So he does, and was amazed how fast, easy to work with. I am running xp pro, with different windows style, using stylexp, and its a great system. Runs well and has no problem. I dont really care if MAC is better than PC or vice versa. But what I believe is to each his own. One person might like one way of software/hardware and one the other. Whoever says PC&#8217;s suck and always uses DELL as an example is just complete bullshit. Check out Micron PC or even home built system. Mine is a AMD athlon which in actuality runs at 2.4ghz and its faster than a 3.2ghz P4. So it all depends on what hardware you have and the way its being used. I use it for games and writing for college. Listening to music and editing photos. </p>
<p>But in all seriousness, quit this crap. What the guy meant in that article is that APPLE likes to falcify or sway or skew their wording. I just dont understand how they can compare it to a PC. A mac and pc are completely different, just wait until someone will compare the fasted intel duo core vs a amd athlon dual core or the new AM2 processor. And then we&#8217;ll see who&#8217;s faster or not. But we must understand that macs and pcs are completely different platforms. The biggest reason why I&#8217;m a pc user is the games, my geforce can kick ass, and it works great and i dont have to wait 4 years until an upgrade comes around. And i dont have to worry about buying the wrong hardware that wouldnt work with a mac. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com</a> baby!!!!</p>
<p>Anyways please quit this argument, its just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-18611</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-18611</guid>
		<description>You know, Dell may end up putting an end to the whole Mac vs Windows BS once and for all if Mike can convince Steve that letting Dell build Macs would be a good move for Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Dell may end up putting an end to the whole Mac vs Windows BS once and for all if Mike can convince Steve that letting Dell build Macs would be a good move for Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-18452</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-18452</guid>
		<description>i am typing this on a brand new mac mini that crashes when a CD is put in and iTunes starts to play from it.

as for it being "silent" obviously you've never put a CD in the drive. It is louder than my car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am typing this on a brand new mac mini that crashes when a CD is put in and iTunes starts to play from it.</p>
<p>as for it being &#8220;silent&#8221; obviously you&#8217;ve never put a CD in the drive. It is louder than my car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-17099</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-17099</guid>
		<description>comment 36

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSX
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comment 36</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSX" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSX</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-17098</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-17098</guid>
		<description>the only reason mac mini runs slow is becuse it uses a laptop hard drive geta a firewire hard drive and is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only reason mac mini runs slow is becuse it uses a laptop hard drive geta a firewire hard drive and is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-16569</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-16569</guid>
		<description>Quote:

Long time known aspect of this oft repeated line: ‘Writing viruses for Mac is not any harder than writing for Win machines, it’s just that the honey pot isn’t there.’

Sorry, you're wrong. All M$ OSes have design comprimises that make then unsecure. Add to that, their typical sloppy programming, and you have tons of security holes. Macs are more secure by design. That's a fact and anybody who says any different, either has no clue about security, has their head in the sand, or makes money off the M$ platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:</p>
<p>Long time known aspect of this oft repeated line: ‘Writing viruses for Mac is not any harder than writing for Win machines, it’s just that the honey pot isn’t there.’</p>
<p>Sorry, you&#8217;re wrong. All M$ OSes have design comprimises that make then unsecure. Add to that, their typical sloppy programming, and you have tons of security holes. Macs are more secure by design. That&#8217;s a fact and anybody who says any different, either has no clue about security, has their head in the sand, or makes money off the M$ platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-16563</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-16563</guid>
		<description>Comment 31, I dont get it. My question is, "Isn't os x based on Darwin?" How is it based on FreeBSD if it's based on Darwin? or is Darwin based on FreeBSD?

 I have read many good things about mac, and I am buying myself one for Christmas. the Mini. the medium one with wireless...      I am beginning to like OS X! 

Why support M$? So Mr. Gates can steal coding for another OS,  and put a tag with his name on it? Go OS X!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment 31, I dont get it. My question is, &#8220;Isn&#8217;t os x based on Darwin?&#8221; How is it based on FreeBSD if it&#8217;s based on Darwin? or is Darwin based on FreeBSD?</p>
<p> I have read many good things about mac, and I am buying myself one for Christmas. the Mini. the medium one with wireless&#8230;      I am beginning to like OS X! </p>
<p>Why support M$? So Mr. Gates can steal coding for another OS,  and put a tag with his name on it? Go OS X!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-14454</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/mac-mini-in-comparison-to-dell/#comment-14454</guid>
		<description>No matter what type of good points you can dig up about dell and microsoft. Apple computers will always outrun windows. Macs look better, work better, are easier to use, and have much better software programs. The mac mini might have its downfalls such as the number of usb or other ports but the point of the mini was so be a cheaper solution to owning a mac. If you have a problem and need "100" usb ports then well too bad for you, get a cheap a** dell. Macs may costs a great deal but your getting your moneys worth. If your too cheap or poor to own a mac then buy a dell. Dells can be good but macs are better. period. 

Plus they make dells look like crap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what type of good points you can dig up about dell and microsoft. Apple computers will always outrun windows. Macs look better, work better, are easier to use, and have much better software programs. The mac mini might have its downfalls such as the number of usb or other ports but the point of the mini was so be a cheaper solution to owning a mac. If you have a problem and need &#8220;100&#8243; usb ports then well too bad for you, get a cheap a** dell. Macs may costs a great deal but your getting your moneys worth. If your too cheap or poor to own a mac then buy a dell. Dells can be good but macs are better. period. </p>
<p>Plus they make dells look like crap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
