<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 1.5 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/02/17/wordpress-15-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/02/17/wordpress-15-released/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, opinions and fascinating discoveries by Elliot, a student at USC</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/02/17/wordpress-15-released/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/02/17/wordpress-15-released/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>Fixed-Width layouts are actually easier to design for sometimes.  I know I prefer fixed width layouts and definately like having the ability to see a general page background.  They could also be thinking that since people like to have things "off to the side" and not just static inside of it, a fixed width would help this.

~Brett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed-Width layouts are actually easier to design for sometimes.  I know I prefer fixed width layouts and definately like having the ability to see a general page background.  They could also be thinking that since people like to have things &#8220;off to the side&#8221; and not just static inside of it, a fixed width would help this.</p>
<p>~Brett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
