<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple finally begins to accept that dual-button mice are superior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, opinions and fascinating discoveries by Elliot, a student at USC</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-18613</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-18613</guid>
		<description>I must say that Logitech mice are better. I have a Logitech MX Laser wireless mouse (with side scrolling) and I can't imagine it being better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that Logitech mice are better. I have a Logitech MX Laser wireless mouse (with side scrolling) and I can&#8217;t imagine it being better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-18612</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-18612</guid>
		<description>The Mighty Mouse sucks. That ball isn't as good as scroll wheels in Microsoft and Logitech mice. For $50, I can go wireless and get a keyboard to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mighty Mouse sucks. That ball isn&#8217;t as good as scroll wheels in Microsoft and Logitech mice. For $50, I can go wireless and get a keyboard to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Lee&#8217;s Blog &#187; Google Wireless Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-17074</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Lee&#8217;s Blog &#187; Google Wireless Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-17074</guid>
		<description>[...] The wireless mouse is my favorite part. It was on my wishlist! It&#8217;s exactly, and I mean exactly, what I wanted. Just a basic optical mouse with two buttons, a scroll wheel (which can also act as a button), and a wireless receiver that is stored in the mouse (the hole you insert it in also has a flap cover so it&#8217;s kept covered when the mouse is in use). I&#8217;m using the mouse right now: the batteries came charged (not sure if they&#8217;re completely charged or just partly charged, but they&#8217;re charged enough to use! And they came in plastic shrink-wrap, so it&#8217;s clear that they&#8217;re new  ). The mouse is really cool. Audrey said she wants my old mouse (the Radioshack one I mentioned here, which has been my primary mouse for the past several months). We&#8217;ll see. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The wireless mouse is my favorite part. It was on my wishlist! It&#8217;s exactly, and I mean exactly, what I wanted. Just a basic optical mouse with two buttons, a scroll wheel (which can also act as a button), and a wireless receiver that is stored in the mouse (the hole you insert it in also has a flap cover so it&#8217;s kept covered when the mouse is in use). I&#8217;m using the mouse right now: the batteries came charged (not sure if they&#8217;re completely charged or just partly charged, but they&#8217;re charged enough to use! And they came in plastic shrink-wrap, so it&#8217;s clear that they&#8217;re new  ). The mouse is really cool. Audrey said she wants my old mouse (the Radioshack one I mentioned here, which has been my primary mouse for the past several months). We&#8217;ll see. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreyscaleFox</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-14176</link>
		<dc:creator>GreyscaleFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliot.com/blog/archives/2005/08/03/apple-finally-begins-to-accept-that-dual-button-mice-are-superior/#comment-14176</guid>
		<description>I so want this, but I think Apple have shot themselfs in the foot with the £50 pricetag. Over here in Blighty, I can get a better mouse for that price, but would concider paying a bit more for an Apple product. But not _that_ much more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I so want this, but I think Apple have shot themselfs in the foot with the £50 pricetag. Over here in Blighty, I can get a better mouse for that price, but would concider paying a bit more for an Apple product. But not _that_ much more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
