FairTax + Taiwan receipt lottery + Apple Store e-receipts = No Income Tax

The Federal Income Tax is Broken

There are many problems with the federal income tax. One is that it allows politicians to protect friends, punish enemies, and to tax certain groups to give benefits to other groups. There are numerous tax loopholes and deductions which make the tax unevenly distributed, and not in a good way.

Another problem is that it is incomprehensibly complex. People who are willing to put in the time and effort to figure out the tax system are able to pay less in taxes. This leads to tremendous inefficiency and resentment. It also enables tax evasion through the use of loopholes. The tax laws are bad enough for individuals, but they’re also pretty awful for businesses.

Next, there is the economic argument. What we tax, we get less of, as long as the item is of elastic supply (and labor certainly is). The income tax discourages people from working: It reduces their incentives to work. Currently, the income tax takes about a third of what most Americans make, which is a large drain on the economy. Effectively, it’s a penalty on productive behavior. Furthermore, the administrative complexity adds additional cost.

In addition, our income tax is ostensibly progressive, so the more you earn, the more you’re supposed to pay. As the marginal benefit of extra work falls, people are less motivated to be more productive and creative. Also, due to deductions and loopholes, the current tax system is effectively regressive in many cases: as income increases, the effective income tax rate actually decreases.

Finally, there is the ethical argument against the income tax. Some believe that the income tax, as a tax on property that individuals create through their own labor, is equivalent to theft. It gives government a claim on our lives and our work, and destroys our privacy in the process.

Income Tax Frustration g2e22e2000000000000f8b3aa68f82a71bd774e36cf0e079922aad26553

Since the federal income tax is so broken, what can be done about it?

A Realistic Way to Eliminate the Federal Income Tax

The FairTax would abolish all federal taxes and replace them with a 23% nationwide sales tax that applies only to new goods and services. This rate was chosen because it would be revenue neutral (PDF), meaning that under the FairTax, the government would still collect about the same amount of tax money that it does today.

A used car and secondhand clothes would be exempt, while groceries would not. Also, everyone would receive a monthly prebate check, which eliminates federal taxes on the poor. The prebate untaxes spending up to the poverty level. It’s a vastly simplified tax.

In other words, it’s a single-rate national sales tax on final retail consumption with no exemption. Business inputs are not taxed. Education tuition is not taxed.

The IRS would be abolished. The FairTax would be administered by the states and a sales tax bureau in the Treasury Department.

U.S. exports are not taxed since they are consumed abroad. Imports are taxed on an equal basis as U.S. produced goods.

Compliance costs would be reduced by 90% because individuals would be exempt from filing tax returns. Businesses making retail sales will file sales tax returns for a total of about 20 million tax filers.

Some people think that the FairTax would be too generous to the rich, and harmful to the middle class. Well, the fact is that under today’s tax laws, about 55,000 millionaires already pay a lower effective tax rate than millions middle-income Americans, which is why The Buffet Rule has been proposed. So today’s income tax is not particularly generous to the middle class. And even if it were, I would argue that the rich probably should not pay inordinately more taxes than other people, from the standpoint of both fairness and economic reality (maximizing everyone’s overall wealth).

If you have more questions about the FairTax, take a look through their research here.

The Problem of Tax Dodging

Now, some people think the FairTax would not work because there will be too much dodging of it. Even though states have used sales taxes for over 60 years, some people think that the FairTax wouldn’t work because the 23% tax rate is “high”.

The U.S. Receipt Lottery

The solution I’d like to propose? A Uniform Invoice lottery, similar to the system that has been employed in Taiwan since 1951. With the Uniform Invoice lottery, better known as the Taiwan receipt lottery, consumers receive a Uniform Invoice receipt with every purchase.


This encourages merchants to keep things on the books. With millions in winnings on the line, customers now demand a receipt with every purchase, so merchants wind up reporting all their sales to the government.

A lottery system works a lot better than a stick-oriented approach, with penalties for businesses that don’t adequately and accurately report. It’s an easy and effective way for the government to maximize tax coverage. While penalties and enforcement are the “obvious” approach, the lottery system is a creative “carrot” incentive that actually works pretty well.

By the way, the receipt lottery would not be the sole means of enforcement. Sales taxes are not voluntary. They are (and still would be) required by law. The receipt lottery is merely an additional incentive in addition to everything else that already enforces sales taxes today. As I mentioned above, states have been using sales taxes for over 60 years.

Modern and Electronic from Day One

In recent years, Taiwan has been moving to an e-invoice initiative, where customers with smart cards or other identification can have the lottery numbers sent to them electronically.

Taipei 101 Taipei06_95764

Since the U.S. has yet to implement anything like the invoices that Taiwan has been using for over 50 years, I propose that we start it off the right way, and have e-invoices from Day 1.

Many private companies are doing it already. Remember the last time you bought something from the Apple Store? You just gave them your email address (or confirmed if it was already on file), and they emailed you a receipt. No paper necessary!

That’s the way the FairTax should work: as a lottery with e-receipts automatically emailed to customers. While there are a couple holdouts who don’t have email, I think it’s fair to require it. It’s 2013. People who don’t have an email address can forfeit their lottery number (or donate it to charity).

Hackathon Project Idea

Implement an e-receipt lottery system for online e-commerce sales. For extra credit, use Bitcoin.
Thanks to Pierre Johnson and Shaon Bhuiyan for reading a draft of this.

2 Responses to “FairTax + Taiwan receipt lottery + Apple Store e-receipts = No Income Tax”

  1. Jack says:

    The rich can choose not to spend the majority of their money, and often do, which is why some of them are rich in the first place, but the poor have no such choice.
    This “fairtax” is anything but, especially considering that the majority of the rich actually got that way from other people’s labor, the most egregious example being the paper-shufflers on Wall Street.
    It is absolutely morally right to tax the rich at progressively higher rates, when the effect on their lives of higher taxes might be the size of their holiday home, as opposed to the effect of lower taxes on the poor which might be school books, or not, health insurance, or not, and other life changing effects.
    A better system might heavily tax savings, investments, and capital gains, which are preoccupations of the rich, rather than consumption, which is a necessary preoccupation of the poor.

  2. Nick says:

    You’ve made no account for the fact the “FairTax” would be regressive- those on the middle class above the poverty line would pay a larger percentage of their incomes in tax than those far above the poverty line. When you factor in that most of the very wealthy put most of their income into investments, they’d be taxed at an even lower rate than they already are. This means that the very wealthy would contribute even less to the provision of public goods – and there’d be no need to dodge, it’d be the law. Not to mention that incentives for the middle class like the mortgage tax credit or tax breaks to buy hybrids or upgrade furnaces or donate to charity or to save for retirement would all be gone. And you can bet the “prebate” checks would be a constant political straw man for the super wealthy as it would be seen as a “handout” to the poor. To say nothing of the likelihood of the levelnofntje poverty line being hotly debated would be high.

    The FairTax is a red herring pushed by the super wealthy to try and even less.

Leave a Reply